Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Name The Demon


From Robert Spencer, at Front Page Magazine:



When in April EBay offered a consecrated host for sale, imagine if Catholics had rioted and seventeen people were killed. The media would have been full of stories about the dark side of the “Christian Right.”

Imagine if, when Muslims desecrated the Tomb of Joseph in Nablus in 2000, destroying it with hammers, rampaging Jewish mobs had killed dozens of Palestinians. The establishment media response would again have inundated us with stories about the heroic Palestinians and their Israeli oppressors.

Neither of those things really happened. But seventeen people have been killed and hundreds wounded in riots by Muslims since Newsweek published its story about an American interrogator flushing a Qur’an down the toilet at the detention center at Guantanamo Bay.

And yet the media establishment seems preoccupied only with the fact that Newsweek, in publishing a false story that it has since retracted, has done a very bad thing. And that the Bush Administration must do something to calm tempers and soothe feelings in the Islamic world.

There is no excusing Newsweek’s irresponsibility in this. But this is not really a story about media bias or carelessness at all. There is a much larger story that is getting hardly any attention at all. The gorilla in the living room that no one wants to notice, is that flushing a Qur’an down the toilet should not be grounds to commit murder.

This aspect of the story is being ignored by spokesmen on both the Left and the Right. After the initial reports of rioting, Juan Cole sputtered, “Whatever goddam military genius came up with the bright idea of flushing the Koran down the toilet at Guantanamo should be court-martialed, and Bush had better get out there apologizing before this thing spirals further out of control.”

On the other side of the political spectrum, Paul Marshall wrung his hands in National Review: “Even if Newsweek publishes a full retraction, the damage is done. Much of the Muslim world will regard it merely as a cover-up and feel reconfirmed in the view that America is at war with Islam.”

Neither Cole nor Marshall, however, made any moral judgment about the rioters. Marshall was furious with Newsweek: “It would be charitable to think that if Newsweek had known how explosive the story was it may have held off until it had more confirmation. If this is true, it is an indication that the media’s widespread failure to pay careful attention to the complexities of religion not only misleads us about domestic and international affairs but also gets people killed.”

Cole, for his part, directed his anger at the Bush Administration: “As a professional historian, I would say we still do not have enough to be sure that the Koran desecration incident took place. We have enough to consider it plausible. Anyway, the important thing politically is that some Muslims have found it plausible, and their outrage cannot be effectively dealt with by simple denial. That is why I say that Bush should just come out and say we can’t be sure that it happened, but if it did it was an excess, and he apologizes if it did happen, and will make sure it doesn’t happen again (if it did).”

Neither one says anything whatsoever about a culture that condones — celebrates —wanton murder of innocent people, mayhem, and destruction in response to the alleged and unproven destruction of a book.

The question here is one of proportionate response. If a Qur’an had indeed been flushed, Muslims would have justifiably been offended. They may justifiably have considered the perpetrators boors, or barbarians, or hell-bound unbelievers. They may justifiably have issued denunciations accordingly. But that is all.

To kill people thousands of miles away who had nothing to do with the act, and to fulminate with threats and murder against the entire Western world, all because of this alleged act, is not just disproportionate. It is not just excessive. It is mad.

And every decent person in the world ought to have the courage to stand up and say that it is mad.

Until we name the demon, we will not be able to cast him out. This brand of Islam which, not only condones killing for flushing a Koran down a toilet, but, indeed, calibrates it, is the problem. I choose to call this brand of Islam; Islamofascism. However, if Muslims choose to call it the true Islam, then they have made their choice.

There is no room in our world for such a murderous ideology. The rest of us are not required to put up with it. In fact, it is within our rights to do away with it altogether.

Usually, I think Robert Spencer goes too far in his condemnation of Islam. For once, I do not think he has gone far enough. So, I will say it myself. Flushing the Koran down the toilet would be a childish offense, if it had been done. However, it is not even something to get offended by.

When I see Islamic idiots standing in the streets of Tehran burning the American flag, I don't even bother to get offended. You know why? Because the flag is just a symbol. To think it is anything more is idolatry.

Listen, you can go ahead and burn my countries flag, you can beat an effigy of George Bush with a stick, and you can urinate on my Bible. I don't care. They are just objects. What I care about are the principles and people of our country. What I care about is the words and ideas of the Bible. Those, no one can take away.

We need to refuse to even play this ridiculous game with the Islamofasicsts. We should not be apologizing, as if we had actually desecrated what Islam stands for. If Islam stands for anything, it ought to stand for people loving each other, and loving God. And the God of Islam ought to stand for the same thing.

If He does not stand for people loving each other, then he is a god who ought to be cast out.